Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

High-throughput inhibitor screening and molecular dynamics simulation studies against Human JAK2

Rawabi Zahed1,2 , Adel M Abuzenadah3,4, Shazi Shakil3,4,5, Adeel G Chaudhary2,3,5

1Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences; 2Center of Innovation in Personalized Medicine; 3Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences; 4King Fahd Medical Research Center; 5Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

For correspondence:-  Rawabi Zahed   Email: rzzahed@kau.edu.sa

Received: 25 September 2023        Accepted: 12 May 2025        Published: 31 May 2025

Citation: Zahed R, Abuzenadah AM, Shakil S, Chaudhary AG. High-throughput inhibitor screening and molecular dynamics simulation studies against Human JAK2. Trop J Pharm Res 2025; 24(5):599-605 doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v24i5.4

© 2025 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the lead molecule for inhibition of JAK2 using high-throughput screening and molecular dynamics simulation.

Methods: The MCULE database was used to screen 5 million ligands in a structure-based mode. The ligand hits were ranked according to VINA scores. Further filtration was achieved by approaches like MCULE-Toxicity Checker, Zero-RO5-Violation-Check, synthetic accessibility and overall pharmacokinetic features. Stability of the JAK2-inhibitor-complex was confirmed by molecular dynamics simulation of 120 ns, which used the AMBER14 force field in YASARA Structure-21.8.27. W.64.

Results: The top molecule, 4-pyrimidinamine, 2,6-dimethyl-5-(2,4,5-trimethylpyrido (2,3-d) pyrimidin-7-yl), demonstrated strong binding with JAK2 involving 17 amino acid residues, 16 of which overlapped with the reference (PDB: 3JY9). It successfully passed all screening tests. The RMSD-time plot indicated that equilibrium was reached around 20 ns. Throughout the simulation from 20 to 120 ns, the backbone RMSD fluctuations remained within a narrow range of 1.0 – 1.7 Å.

Conclusion: The ligand, 4-pyrimidinamine, 2,6-dimethyl-5-(2,4,5-trimethylpyrido (2,3-d) pyrimidin-7-yl), meets the ADMET criteria. Also, an extended 120 ns Molecular Dynamics Simulation confirms the feasibility of the 'JAK2-Top ligand' complex. This ligand is a promising lead for designing inhibitors against JAK2 and should be further evaluated in future laboratory experiments

Keywords: JAK2, High throughput virtual screening, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Versatile therapeutic target

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2025; 24: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5
2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates