Maha A AlMolaiki1,2,3
,
Mohammed Alessa4,
Husam I Ardah5
For correspondence:- Maha AlMolaiki Email: ph.mahaalm@gmail.com
Received: 2 August 2024 Accepted: 11 June 2025 Published: 31 July 2025
Citation: AlMolaiki MA, Alessa M, Ardah HI. Appropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-critically ill patients in a tertiary academic center: A retrospective study. Trop J Pharm Res 2025; 24(7):957-962 doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v24i7.12
© 2025 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..
Purpose: To investigate the appropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in non-critically ill hospitalized patients. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study that included all non-critically ill adult patients (n = 369) admitted to the General Medical Wards of King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The patients were administered proton pump inhibitors such as esomeprazole and omeprazole; histamine-2 receptor antagonists such as ranitidine; and cytoprotective agents such as sucralfate in different dosage regimens. Baseline characteristics, risk factors, and acid-suppressive therapy were evaluated based on therapeutic guidelines of the Society for Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) on stress ulcer prophylaxis. Results: A total of 369 patients were included in the study with mean age of 61.65 ± 18.83 years. Diabetes mellitus was the most encountered comorbidity 169 (45.8 %). Dual antiplatelet use was the most encountered medication 79 (21.94 %) with only 55 (14.9 %) patients meeting the criteria of the American Society for Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) Therapeutic Guidelines on stress ulcer prophylaxis. Proton-pump inhibitors were the most used 358 (97.02 %) in acid suppressive therapy. Conclusion: Inappropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis is high in this study leading to increase in medication adverse effects. The findings of this study will help in implementing a comprehensive protocol to closely follow up on all admitted patients who use stress ulcer prophylaxis for certain indications.